Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consistency of the STO data after linking with DBpedia #12

Open
mmaltsev opened this issue Feb 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Consistency of the STO data after linking with DBpedia #12

mmaltsev opened this issue Feb 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@igrangel @mmaltsev

Comments

@mmaltsev
Copy link
Collaborator

Manually reviewing enriched version of the STO I found a number of inconsistencies and confusions, such as:
sto:SCOR-rdf:type-dbo:Person
sto:W3C_SPARQL-rdf:type-dby:PsychologicalFeature100023100
sto:IEC_61400-rdf:type-Turbine104498523

Obviously, these are the problems of DBpedia but we should think, is there any way to avoid such errors.
@igrangel
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue is of great importance for the method since you detected inconsistencies. Therefore, we should think in an automated method to validate the accuracy of the method.
I was suggested to used ten-fold cross-validation.
How can we implement such a method?

@igrangel igrangel changed the title Consistency of the DBpedia data Consistency of the STO data after linking with DBpedia Feb 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@igrangel igrangel

@mmaltsev mmaltsev

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@igrangel @mmaltsev