Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Hey,
Yeah, sounds like a good idea. Hydrogen does support stereo samples. But those can be mixed down. (And the widget rendering the underlying audio file should learn to properly render stereo files in two lane instead of one).
The instrument names are appended to the base name set in the export dialog. When using
Why would you want to maintain the same ordering? You could prepend a number to the instrument's name.
For having different parts of a physical instrument being bundled together we have so called instrument components (since version 0.9.7). Each instrument can consist of multiple components (per default one) and each component consists of multiple samples. Back than this feature was merged at a very early development state and is nowhere near being properly integrated in the UI. Plus, its original designed was also entwined with an aux channel for each component displayed as "Drumkit Component" in the Mixer. I haven't seen any user actually using this feature. But for the 1.2.X release line I did my best to properly integrate it in the core part of Hydrogen to allow using it without crashing the application. For 2.0 I removed the aux channel from the drumkit definition and plan to rework the instrument editor for 2.1 to properly show and support these instrument components. Till then, their usage is somewhat experimental. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the quick reply and considering some of the points.. As far as the track order mattering from Hydrogen to DAW if you've spent a few hours of time programming in Hydrogen you will probably be familiar with the Instrument position and usually Kicks, Hats and Shells are at the top section of the Instrument stack because they usually have the most programming events. To me it stands to reason you would want at least a similar order in the DAW because it is likely the Kick and Shells will get the most dynamics and effects applied so you don't want them alphabetically strewn across the DAW tracks. As an example I often export 18-22 kit pieces to the DAW and renaming 22 pieces with a numbering scheme is of course possible but very tedious. If Hydrogen could number and preserve the Instrument order on export it would be handier than you might think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
Recently I've had need of the multitrack export functionality of Hydrogen and although it works in a general way I find there are a lot of post-export modifications needed to make the exported files work in a DAW as you would expect and correlate to a workflow with real multitrack drums.
All tracks are exported as stereo with no option for mono. Drum shells especially would be mic'd Mono in a studio, stereo tracks for every kit piece are overly complex and not well suited to panned mixing in a DAW. I have to run a SoX batch command on exports to make them mono. An export option for this would be very useful.
The generated export filenames are far too long to appear in a DAW's track header, an option to export with only the actual Instrument/kit piece name without song title would be helpful.
Tracks are exported alphabetically and not in order of Kit piece in the library, when importing into another program tracks are also imported alphabetically unless filenames are modified with numbers so this would also be handy to somehow control in the export phase so manual renumbering is not required.
For kit pieces where there are more than one instrument representing a kit-piece (ie a Ride tip, Ride Bell or Snare Sidestick, Snare Center, Snare Edge) being able to select a group export and combine more than one instrument into an exported track would also make things less complicated for DAW work later.
These are some real-world hurdles I've encountered when using H2's multitrack export capabilities..
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions