Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About evaluation on P3M500 #1

Open
felix-ky opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

About evaluation on P3M500 #1

felix-ky opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@felix-ky
Copy link

felix-ky commented Jun 8, 2023

Hi, thnaks for releasing the great repo and paper.
I evaluate matteformer and vitmatte (both using pretrained weight) on P3M500, but both model's MSE error (times 1e3, computed on unknown areas) are 10 times of your result in Table 4, so are you scaling 1e2 for mse error in unknown areas?
image

@JingfengYao
Copy link
Member

Hi, thnaks for releasing the great repo and paper. I evaluate matteformer and vitmatte (both using pretrained weight) on P3M500, but both model's MSE error (times 1e3, computed on unknown areas) are 10 times of your result in Table 4, so are you scaling 1e2 for mse error in unknown areas? image

Hi, thanks for your question.

The evaluation code given by ViTMatte evaluates MSE on only trimap unknown region. However, since the methods in Table 4 are not all trimap guided, it is unfair to evaluate in that way. So our results are evaluated on the whole image.

As ViTMatte for instance, for same the inference result, MSE would be 13.17 on unknown regions and be 1.24 on the whole image.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants