CSI: volume.name uniqueness is not enforced per-plugin

[tgross]

@ron-savoia wrote in #18741 (comment)

I also noticed another oddity when creating volumes in separate namespaces where the volume name is the same. When the name is the same for two volumes in separate nomad namespaces only one volume was created on the storage side, which was accessable by both jobs in different namespaces.

In the CSI spec, the CreateVolumeRequest.name field is intended as both an idempotency token and a suggested name for the storage provider. Nomad compounds this arguably unfortunate-but-unavoidable design decision by overloading it further to be the display name for the volume. If you send CreateVolumeRequest with the same name, that's supposed to tell the storage provider that the volume is the same one.

We should validate that the same name isn't being reused for different volumes for the same plugin, in the RPC handler.