You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I also have similar issue. In the paper itself, it is being said that
The prior probability P(Y~|D~) is counted directly from the noisy dataset.
But, it is also being said that
Beyond their results, we attempt to propose a theoretically sound approach addressing a general instance-based noise regime without knowing or estimating noise rates.
In the implementation, if we set noise_prior = None, then
Initializing it with noise_prior = np.ones(num_classes)
Avoiding the two lines of noise_prior_cur update process
and all on CIFAR-10 dataset, but my best result was the best test acc simply dropped from 69.28 (using the dataset's known noise prior) to 46.54. Any lead about how to set the noise_prior on unknown prior probability of the dataset's noise? @haochenglouis
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: