Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should extend usage be removed from the spec? #160

Open
glen-84 opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #174
Open

Should extend usage be removed from the spec? #160

glen-84 opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #174

Comments

@glen-84
Copy link
Contributor

glen-84 commented Jan 29, 2025

The use of extend is not required, right?

There are ~24 usages of extend type and extend schema in the spec.

Should extend be removed, or am I missing something?
@PascalSenn PascalSenn linked a pull request Mar 6, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
@PascalSenn PascalSenn linked a pull request Mar 6, 2025 that will close this issue
Fix validation rules #174
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix validation rules graphql/composite-schemas-spec
1 participant
@glen-84