Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

worse than tinypng.com #92

Open
cos2004 opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

worse than tinypng.com #92

cos2004 opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@cos2004
Copy link

cos2004 commented Mar 20, 2017

I guetzli a jpg image(quality:84), compare with tinypng.com, tinypng is smaller... feel so confused...

@kornelski
Copy link

kornelski commented Mar 20, 2017

File size depends on quality. It's very easy to make a smaller file that has lower quality. In JPEG even a tiny difference in quality can decrease file size a lot.

Guetzli's advantage is having relatively small file for the very high quality it gives. Other tools will either give lower quality or larger file, but you're unlikely to find one that beats it on both.

I've made a presentation explaining that in depth:
https://ldnwebperf.org/sessions/snake-oil-in-image-compression-how-to-ensure-youre-getting-best-quality-and-file-size/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants