check_regex.yaml

# There are two ways to configure/add standard cases to test:
# Short:
# - method: [num, 'name/message', 'regex pattern']
#
# Verbose:
# - target:
#     method: num
#   message: name/message
#   pattern: regex pattern
#
# Short requires quotation marks for the strings, the verbose must not have quotation marks
# else the pattern and name/message will be parsed wrong and can break the script.
# Single-quotes are recommended because they allow special characters and won't parse escapes
#
# Verbose is more extensible and flexible, while short is not and is a fixed pattern as
# shown above.
#
# There are currently only two methods:
#   exactly: result == target -- fail otherwise
#   no_more: result <= target -- warn when below target, fail otherwise
#

standards:
    - exactly: [0, "mangled characters", '[\u0000\uFFFF\uFFFD]']
    - exactly: [8, "escapes", '\\\\(red|blue|green|black|b|i[^mc])']
    - exactly: [9, "Del()s", '\WDel\(']

    - exactly: [1, "/atom text paths", '"/atom']
    - exactly: [1, "/area text paths", '"/area']
    - exactly: [17, "/datum text paths", '"/datum']
    - exactly: [4, "/mob text paths", '"/mob']
    - exactly: [44, "/obj text paths", '"/obj']
    - exactly: [0, "/turf text paths", '"/turf']
    - exactly: [117, "text2path uses", "text2path"]

    - exactly: [18, "world<< uses", 'world[ \t]*<<']
    - exactly: [0, "world.log<< uses", 'world.log[ \t]*<<']

    - exactly:
          [
              269,
              "non-bitwise << uses",
              '(?<!\d)(?<!\d\s)(?<!<)<<(?!=|\s\d|\d|<|\/)',
          ]
    - exactly: [0, "incorrect indentations", '^(?:  +)(?!\*)']
    - exactly: [0, "superflous whitespace", '[ \t]+$']
    - exactly: [0, "mixed indentation", '^( +\t+|\t+ +)']
    - exactly:
          [
              21,
              "padding inside parentheses",
              '\(([\t ]+([^)"\n\\]*)|([^("\n]+)[\t ]+)\)',
          ]

    - exactly: [1, "Old-style proc references", '\.proc/(\w+)']
    - exactly: [0, "Old-style typed proc references", '([\w/]+?)/?\.proc/(\w+)']

    - no_more:
          [
              34,
              "indentions inside defines",
              '^(\s*)#define (\w*)( {2,}| ?\t+)(?!(\/\/|\/\*))',
          ]