You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am wondering if EnigmalOT supports something in the following situation:
Node A and B are within range of and connected to the gateway
Node C is OUT of the range of the gateway and node B
Node C is IN of the range of node A
Now in this situation can Node C:
Connect to node A
Use the connection to node A to connect to the network/gateway (by node A relaying messages from node C)
Send a message to Node B (using the same function node A could use to send a msg to node B), this would mean node A automatically routing the message to node B (or to gateway which then routes to node B if your implementation doesn't use P2P)
Essentially i am asking if nodes outside the range of the root node/gateway can join the network through another node(s) which ARE connected to the root node/gateway and use the functions like a node within range of the gateway. Or would i have to implement this myself (EG a layer on top of your layer of ESP now - sounds inefficient to me).
I know this has been done with ESP-MESH (aka ESP-NOW) but cant find a "easy" to use wrapper/library and i really like the other features this library offers so hoping this is the case (as i need this for my application).
Sorry if this is confusingly worded or already addressed but saw no mention of it in the docs, technical spec or current/closed issues so wanted to ask. Many thanks, Leah
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am wondering if EnigmalOT supports something in the following situation:
Now in this situation can Node C:
Essentially i am asking if nodes outside the range of the root node/gateway can join the network through another node(s) which ARE connected to the root node/gateway and use the functions like a node within range of the gateway. Or would i have to implement this myself (EG a layer on top of your layer of ESP now - sounds inefficient to me).
I know this has been done with ESP-MESH (aka ESP-NOW) but cant find a "easy" to use wrapper/library and i really like the other features this library offers so hoping this is the case (as i need this for my application).
Sorry if this is confusingly worded or already addressed but saw no mention of it in the docs, technical spec or current/closed issues so wanted to ask. Many thanks, Leah
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: