Extend the shared library to provide more data for Bitbucket PRs

[sergeibbb]

Description

There is a getPullRequestsForUserAndWorkspace method in the shared library. But in #4099 we used the own implementation of it, because the shared library does not provide info about reviewers.

Also we need URLs of head and base repositories, to avoid hacking it like here:

Our current Bitbucket conversion of type is here, all information is collected in one request:

vscode-gitlens/src/plus/integrations/providers/bitbucket/models.ts

Lines 366 to 397 in 289fb9e

	{
	base: {
	branch: pr.destination.branch.name,
	sha: pr.destination.commit.hash,
	repo: pr.destination.repository.name,
	owner: pr.destination.repository.full_name.split('/')[0],
	exists: true,
	url: pr.destination.repository.links.html.href,
	},
	head: {
	branch: pr.source.branch.name,
	sha: pr.source.commit.hash,
	repo: pr.source.repository.name,
	owner: pr.source.repository.full_name.split('/')[0],
	exists: true,
	url: pr.source.repository.links.html.href,
	},
	isCrossRepository: pr.source.repository.uuid !== pr.destination.repository.uuid,
	},
	undefined, // isDraft
	undefined, // additions
	undefined, // deletions
	undefined, // commentsCount
	undefined, // thumbsCount
	getBitbucketReviewDecision(pr),
	pr.participants // reviewRequests:PullRequestReviewer[]
	?.filter(prt => prt.role === 'REVIEWER')
	.map(prt => fromBitbucketParticipantToReviewer(prt, pr.closed_by, pr.state))
	.filter(rv => rv.state === PullRequestReviewState.ReviewRequested),
	pr.participants // latestReviews:PullRequestReviewer[]
	?.filter(prt => prt.participated_on != null)
	.map(prt => fromBitbucketParticipantToReviewer(prt, pr.closed_by, pr.state)),

Goals:

1. the logic should be implemented in the shared library
2. GitLens should remove the custom implementation and start using the shared library.

Implementation

• shared library: https://github.com/gitkraken/provider-apis-package-js/pull/223
• GitLens: Extend the shared library to provide more data for bitbucket prs (and use it here) #4141

[sergeibbb]

Hi @gitkraken-jacobw

Here is a ticket related to making some changes in the shared library.

What do you think is the best way to handle it?