-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
Fix the gap in the installation guides. #444
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hello @Martech-WorkShop I totally understand your point and you're right. We'll work on some other options this year :
|
Thanks for responding @jdenquin Sounds good, let me know if I can be of any help... |
I totally agree @jdenquin . |
Since I did not get a clear path forward from this issue, I'm going to give it a go on my own. If anyone wants to join, drop me a line here... |
@Martech-WorkShop we released a new docker image that embed everything you need, it ease the deployment : https://getlago.com/docs/guide/self-hosted/docker#run-the-app-with-a-one-click-docker-command More configurations to come for it! |
Oh, nice! Do you need any help with that? |
A one-click recipe for Coolify (already requested here) could be a great step forward. |
@wottpal we'll take a look a it! |
Coolify support would be super cool 🙏 |
Thanks all — I’d like to propose a structured solution to help bridge the gap between “localhost” and production setups, especially for SMB users running Lago behind a proxy or on a VPS. ✅ Proposed Additions to the Installation Guide1. Standalone VPS Deployment Guide
2. Reverse Proxy Integration (NGINX or Caddy)
3. Non-Compose (Manual Docker Run) Setup
🧱 Optional: One-Click VPS Installer (Shell Script)We could include a
📄 Why This MattersMany teams evaluating Lago for production billing won’t use Kubernetes, and while the Docker “localhost” recipe is great for developers, it doesn’t address operational realities like:
This documentation gap may create friction at the “production adoption” step, especially for smaller teams. |
Thanks @jigarpatel1007 |
Describe the ISSUE
When using the official guide on how to install Lago, the guide seems to target a test environment based on "localhost".
That is perfect for playing but not for serious testing, much less for production.
Since there are no more options, you are forced to jump into Kubernetes if you want something more serious.
But, unless you are an accounting firm, you have no use for a K8S deployment, but at the same time, you can't run it on "localhost". You need a proper VPS setup on the cloud, or like in my case, you need to run it on a larger server, behind a proxy.
I have requested the pricing for the premium hosted version and while I am certain the price is fair for a larger organization, for many SMB's its a tad steep.
I am certain Lago FOSS is very enticing to many SMBs who also might not have the technical capabilities to deploy on their own without guidance or help.
Hence, I suggest expanding the number of guides by adding a VPS guide, a Reverse proxy guide, maybe even a non-compose guide, which could make the architecture much more obvious to a whole lot more people.
In all these cases I would be happy to work on the guides myself if you consider these could in fact be relevant to the project.
NOTE: A development installation guide is also provided and the corresponding compose file found in the repo, which is great but does not solve the issue for staging and production since it is also focused on local development for "app.lago.dev"
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Clear and concise guides (or even and automated script (or two)) facilitating installation for the most common use cases, whatever those are.
Support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: