You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I am not mistaken, currently the only way to change the envelope of an RTreeObject within the tree is to remove then re-insert it somewhere else later.
Most generically using:
Either remove_with_selection_function() or drain_with_selection_function()
Then using insert()
I am not familiar with all the technical details of rstar, but like most trees, I believe there may be some optimization to be done in some area:
Moving an RTreeObject within the same leaf
If the move is small, going up leaves would be faster than looking to insert from the root (That would require choosing a Strategy / Policy)
It would probably need some work for all primitives, like GeomWithData.
If I am not mistaken, currently the only way to change the envelope of an
RTreeObject
within the tree is to remove then re-insert it somewhere else later.Most generically using:
remove_with_selection_function()
ordrain_with_selection_function()
insert()
I am not familiar with all the technical details of
rstar
, but like most trees, I believe there may be some optimization to be done in some area:RTreeObject
within the same leafinsert
from the root (That would require choosing a Strategy / Policy)It would probably need some work for all primitives, like
GeomWithData
.Resulting methods would probably look like:
pub fn relocate_with_selection_function<F> (&mut self, function: F, new_envelope: RTreeObject) -> Option<T>
pub fn relocate_all_with_selection_function<F>(&mut self, function: F, new_envelope: RTreeObject) -> Option<T>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: