Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate fine-grained cloud provider rate limits #71

Open
rfranzke opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate fine-grained cloud provider rate limits #71

rfranzke opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@dkistner
Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage)

Comments

@rfranzke
Copy link
Member

rfranzke commented Apr 8, 2020

What would you like to be added:
With 1.18 the Azure cloud provider has several more configuration options for fine-tuning individual rate limits, see kubernetes/kubernetes#86515. It makes sense to investigate which of these flags should be set.

Why is this needed:
Reducing risk to run into ARM rate limits.

/cc @dkistner @MSSedusch
@rfranzke rfranzke added the kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension label Apr 8, 2020
@rfranzke rfranzke changed the title Investigate fine-grained rate limits Investigate fine-grained cloud provider rate limits Apr 8, 2020
@dkistner dkistner self-assigned this Apr 8, 2020
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) label Jun 8, 2020
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) and removed lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) labels Sep 19, 2020
@dkistner dkistner removed the lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) label Nov 9, 2020
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) label Sep 22, 2021
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) and removed lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) labels Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dkistner dkistner

Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dkistner @rfranzke @gardener-robot