We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For some papers, only de-absorpted spectra are available. I simply leave the information on the assumed EBL model in the comments.
Would it make sense to add a keyword to the SED files to indicate that the values are de-absorped?
e.g. in 2011ApJ...727..129A, I have power law fits to the absorped spectra, but spectrals points for de-absorped spectra.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicate? #161
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry - yes - close this one and keep #161
No branches or pull requests
For some papers, only de-absorpted spectra are available. I simply leave the information on the assumed EBL model in the comments.
Would it make sense to add a keyword to the SED files to indicate that the values are de-absorped?
e.g. in 2011ApJ...727..129A, I have power law fits to the absorped spectra, but spectrals points for de-absorped spectra.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: