-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MACSEC communication between flannel nodes #1868
Comments
How are you configuring MACSEC? Flannel configures VxLAN UDP tunnel to connect the pods on the different nodes. The tunnel is configured using the L3 addresses I think you can force the flannel L3 traffic to use the L2 MACSEC interface. |
A virtual MACSEC interface is created in the Pod and MACSEC is installed in the Pod. |
when you are using the Vxlan tunnel I think you can't forward macsec packets. K8s uses different L3 networks for each node then macsec is limited only on the single node. If you want to enforce security on the communication between the node you should use Wireguard as backend. |
I want to communicate between flannel nodes using MACSEC communication.
Is it correct to understand that MACSEC communication is a specification that requires communication in the same segment?
Also, if flannel is used with K8s, it will be a different segment, but is it possible to use the same segment?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: