We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why is the perplexity score calculated as (2**avg_nll_loss) instead of the regular exp(avg_nll_loss)
2**avg_nll_loss
exp(avg_nll_loss)
fairseq/fairseq_cli/eval_lm.py
Line 200 in bedb259
Was this a deliberate choice made by the fairseq team? or is there some other reason behind it?
cc @b-dickson @zorant
pip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
❓ Questions and Help
Before asking:
What is your question?
Why is the perplexity score calculated as (
2**avg_nll_loss
) instead of the regularexp(avg_nll_loss)
fairseq/fairseq_cli/eval_lm.py
Line 200 in bedb259
Was this a deliberate choice made by the fairseq team? or is there some other reason behind it?
cc @b-dickson @zorant
What's your environment?
pip
, source):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: