diff --git a/notes/2025/2025-07-10.md b/notes/2025/2025-07-10.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8d34b45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/notes/2025/2025-07-10.md
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+# 2025-07-10 ESLint TSC Meeting Notes
+
+## Transcript
+
+[`2025-07-10-transcript.md`](2025-07-10-transcript.md)
+
+## Attending
+
+- Nicholas C. Zakas (@nzakas) - TSC
+- Francesco Trotta (@fasttime) - TSC
+
+@nzakas moderated, and @sam3k took notes.
+
+## Topics
+
+### Statuses
+
+* **@nzakas:** been working on a couple of RFCs (CSS variable tracking and rule language metadata), adding token methods to JSONSourceCode, and a bunch of build-related stuff (contributor pool report generation, automated baseline data). Opened PR for moving more types into `@eslint/core`: https://github.com/eslint/rewrite/pull/237
+* **@fasttime:** been working on switching performance tests to hyperfine, updating the multithread linting RFC, and reviewing issues and PRs.
+
+### RFC Duty update:
+
+* This week - @Nicholas C. Zakas
+* July 14 - @fasttime
+* July 21 - @mdjermanovic
+
+### [Change Request: internal `rule.meta.docs.recommended` type is leaked](https://github.com/eslint/rewrite/issues/234)
+
+**TSC Summary:** This issue reports that the internal type for `rule.meta.docs.recommended` in ESLint is too restrictive—it is typed as boolean | undefined, but some plugins (notably typescript-eslint) use other values (like strings or objects) for config generation. This causes TypeScript type errors when using defineConfig(), even though it works at runtime.
+
+**TSC Question:** What do we want to do here? Some options:
+- Omit the recommended field from the type definition.
+- Change its type to unknown (with a note that ESLint itself uses boolean).
+- Use a union type to allow any value for recommended in configs.
+
+**Resolution:** We've agreed to set the type of `meta.docs.recommended` to `unknown`.
+
+### [feat: multithread linting](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/19794)
+
+**TSC Summary:** The multithread linting PR is in progress with two remaining points to address before review.
+
+**TSC Question:** What is the status and timeline for completion?
+
+**Resolution:** @fasttime has two points to decide/work on before making this ready for review:
+1. Emitting warning when concurrency is used inappropriately (e.g. because there aren't many files)
+2. How to handle concurrency=1
+
+@fasttime will post an updated description of the problem on the weekend and @mdjermanovic will participate in the discussion.
+
+### [Change Request: Autogenerated type definitions for rules](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/18912)
+
+**TSC Summary:** This issue has been open for 9 months without a PR. Tanuj is assigned to work on autogenerated type definitions for rules.
+
+**TSC Question:** What is the status and approach for this issue?
+
+**Resolution:** @nzakas will ping Tanuj again to check on the status and approach.
+
+### [Contributor Pool June 2025](https://github.com/eslint/tsc-meetings/blob/main/notes/2025/2025-07-01-contributor-pool.md)
+
+- @xbinaryx: $1200 for everything
+- @sethamus: $600
+- @TKDev7: $300
+- @Pixel998: $200
+- @SwetaTanwar: $500 (no-missing-link-fragments rule took a bunch of work)
+- @jgoz: $100
+- @fisker: $100
+- @ota-meshi: $300
+- @remcohaszing: $200 (PR took longer than usual to complete)
+
+### Scheduled release for July 11th, 2025
+
+**Action Items:**
+
+- @fasttime will do the release
+    - `eslint`
+    - `@eslint/js`
\ No newline at end of file