Skip to content

Reproduce Table 1 in paper #2

@bkj

Description

@bkj

I'm interested in trying to reproduce the numbers in Table 1 of the paper, but the example script you have for training a downstream model gets substantially better performance than shown in the table -- do you have ideas why that may be? Different dataset perhaps?

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions