Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identification of rare celltypes #31

Open
Elhl93 opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Identification of rare celltypes #31

Elhl93 opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Elhl93
Copy link

Elhl93 commented Sep 3, 2020

Hi,

I really like the idea behind DESC, great work!

We have a single-cell dataset, which we harmonized using harmony. As a test I wanted to compare wether we can identify similar or the same celltypes when processing the data with DESC.

However, the algorithm with the settings I use does not seem to identify rare celltypes. In my previous clustering with harmony & scanpy I obtained 13 clusters, ranging from 35% to 0.4% of total cell abundance. The markers of the rare clusters are in line with known/validated markers, so I have high confidence that the rare clusters are true. I see this behaviour of celltypes with an abundance of <1%. As some celltypes are very similar, I added more hidden layers to improve the model performance (my dataset has in total 80k cells). Increasing the batch size did not help to solve the problem.

desc.train(adata, dims=[adata.shape[1], 64, 64, 32, 32], tol=0.005, n_neighbors=20,
batch_size=256, louvain_resolution=[0.5],
save_dir="test1“, do_tsne=False, learning_rate=300,
do_umap=True, num_Cores_tsne=4,
save_encoder_weights=True, pretrain_epochs=100)

Happy to hear your thoughts on this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant