You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a single-cell dataset, which we harmonized using harmony. As a test I wanted to compare wether we can identify similar or the same celltypes when processing the data with DESC.
However, the algorithm with the settings I use does not seem to identify rare celltypes. In my previous clustering with harmony & scanpy I obtained 13 clusters, ranging from 35% to 0.4% of total cell abundance. The markers of the rare clusters are in line with known/validated markers, so I have high confidence that the rare clusters are true. I see this behaviour of celltypes with an abundance of <1%. As some celltypes are very similar, I added more hidden layers to improve the model performance (my dataset has in total 80k cells). Increasing the batch size did not help to solve the problem.
Hi,
I really like the idea behind DESC, great work!
We have a single-cell dataset, which we harmonized using harmony. As a test I wanted to compare wether we can identify similar or the same celltypes when processing the data with DESC.
However, the algorithm with the settings I use does not seem to identify rare celltypes. In my previous clustering with harmony & scanpy I obtained 13 clusters, ranging from 35% to 0.4% of total cell abundance. The markers of the rare clusters are in line with known/validated markers, so I have high confidence that the rare clusters are true. I see this behaviour of celltypes with an abundance of <1%. As some celltypes are very similar, I added more hidden layers to improve the model performance (my dataset has in total 80k cells). Increasing the batch size did not help to solve the problem.
desc.train(adata, dims=[adata.shape[1], 64, 64, 32, 32], tol=0.005, n_neighbors=20,
batch_size=256, louvain_resolution=[0.5],
save_dir="test1“, do_tsne=False, learning_rate=300,
do_umap=True, num_Cores_tsne=4,
save_encoder_weights=True, pretrain_epochs=100)
Happy to hear your thoughts on this!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: