Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Will Ego be simpler in terms of software development than SGX SDK? #222

Open
digitalinformation opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@digitalinformation
Copy link

Hello, I have recently been doing blockchain privacy protection based on trusted execution environment, can ego act as an alternative to SGX SDK? Will it be simpler in terms of software development than SGX SDK? If it is my research in this direction, do you have any affiliate chains recommended for development in combination with SGX?

@thomasten
Copy link
Member

Hi,
Yes, EGo is an alternative to Intel's SGX SDK - as long as you want to implement your app in Go. One design goal is to keep the development workflow simple.

I can't recommend any specific chains. But we know from feedback that blockchain projects are a common use case with EGo.

@mbrandenburger
Copy link

@digitalinformation We use EGo to run smart contracts (chaincode) on Hyperledger Fabric. See this https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-private-chaincode/tree/main/ecc_go

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants