FsVault: Better compatibility of FsVault with OpenSSL for EC key generation #3566
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Thanks for your contribution 🔥 We will take a look asap 🚀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@thomasrutger thanks for raising this, although i'm not 100% sure what your ask is. Do you want to replace JKS with PEM? if so, why? Please consider, that PEMs are not drop-in replacements for JKS, as they only contain one key(-pair). So you'd need some way of resolving the correct PEM file for any given alias, or switch over to *.pfx. *.pfx files can host multiple keys, and they can be password-protected, so there would roughly be feature parity, but at that point, we're just replacing one thing with another without added value. Next, if there really is a bug with storing EC Keys in a JKS, please provide some references for that, like an official bugreport or a known-issue. Also, that would be outside of the purview of EDC. If there is a bug in EDC when reading EC Keys from a JKS, then please provide a log, or some added info. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Feature Request
When using the FsVault, I tried to use OpenSSL together with keytool to generate the Keystore with the EC keys. However, this is apparently not supported and I read that I should use Keystore Explorer instead to generate keys. This is inconvenient when you want to generate keys from a script.
Additionally, it seems that the keys are converted to PEM format before they are used. So why not just configure the keys in PEM files directly, instead of using JKS?
Which Areas Would Be Affected?
FsVault
Why Is the Feature Desired?
Better compatibility with standard tooling
Solution Proposal
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions