-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(node-fetch/http2): handle Http2 streams correctly #2093
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🚀 Snapshot Release (
|
Package | Version | Info |
---|---|---|
@whatwg-node/fetch |
0.10.5-alpha-20250222121046-869be2474b8eedcb461dd935cb99971cc0bdab21 |
npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎ |
@whatwg-node/node-fetch |
0.7.11-alpha-20250222121046-869be2474b8eedcb461dd935cb99971cc0bdab21 |
npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎ |
@whatwg-node/server |
0.9.69-alpha-20250222121046-869be2474b8eedcb461dd935cb99971cc0bdab21 |
npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎ |
✅
|
✅
|
✅
|
✅
|
✅
|
WalkthroughThis pull request applies patches to address a specific HTTP/2 error, "TypeError: bodyInit.stream is not a function," occurring during the parsing of incoming HTTP/2 requests. It refines the verification logic for Blob objects in the node-fetch package and updates the HTTP/2 test suite to use asynchronous request handling with structured JSON responses. No public interface changes were made. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant Handler
Client->>Server: Send HTTP/2 request (includes JSON payload)
Server->>Handler: Forward request asynchronously
Handler->>Handler: Parse request body as JSON
alt Successful parse
Handler->>Server: Return structured JSON response (body, headers, method, URL)
else Parsing error
Handler->>Server: Return error response
end
Server->>Client: Deliver JSON response
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/server/test/http2.spec.ts (1)
94-111
: Consider adding error case tests.While the happy path is well tested, consider adding test cases for error scenarios such as invalid JSON or stream errors to ensure robust error handling.
expect(receivedNodeRequest).toMatchObject({ data: { body: { hello: 'world', }, method: 'POST', url: expect.stringMatching(/^http:\/\/localhost:\d+\/hi$/), headers: { 'content-type': 'application/json', }, }, headers: { ':status': 418, 'content-type': 'text/plain;charset=UTF-8', 'x-is-this-http2': 'yes', }, status: 418, }); + +it('should handle invalid JSON gracefully', async () => { + const handleRequest = jest.fn(async (request: Request) => { + try { + await request.json(); + } catch (error) { + return new Response('Invalid JSON', { status: 400 }); + } + return new Response('OK'); + }); + // ... rest of the test setup +});
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.changeset/mighty-worlds-smoke.md
(1 hunks)packages/node-fetch/src/Body.ts
(1 hunks)packages/server/test/http2.spec.ts
(4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: unit / node 18
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/server/test/http2.spec.ts (2)
30-46
: LGTM! Enhanced test coverage for HTTP/2 request handling.The async request handler now properly tests JSON parsing and response generation, which helps validate the fix for the
bodyInit.stream
TypeError.
61-65
: LGTM! Proper content-type header setup.Setting the content-type to 'application/json' and writing JSON data ensures the request is properly formatted for testing the stream handling.
packages/node-fetch/src/Body.ts (1)
511-511
:✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Robust type checking for Blob objects.
The enhanced type check ensures that
stream
is actually a function before treating the object as a Blob, effectively preventing theTypeError: bodyInit.stream is not a function
error.Let's verify this fixes all potential Blob-related issues:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any other Blob-related type checks or stream usage rg -l "stream.*function|instanceof.*Blob|isBlob"Length of output: 189
Blob type checking update verified and approved.
The change in
packages/node-fetch/src/Body.ts
now properly ensures that thestream
property is not only present but also a function, which effectively prevents theTypeError: bodyInit.stream is not a function
error. A repository-wide search shows that similar Blob-related type checks and stream usages are present in:
packages/node-fetch/src/FormData.ts
packages/node-fetch/src/Blob.ts
packages/node-fetch/tests/Blob.spec.ts
This consistency across the codebase confirms that the updated check in
Body.ts
aligns with the overall Blob handling strategy..changeset/mighty-worlds-smoke.md (1)
1-7
: LGTM! Clear and informative changeset.The changeset properly documents the issue being fixed and its impact across multiple packages.
Fixes dotansimha/graphql-yoga#3803
Fixes the
TypeError: bodyInit.stream is not a function
error thrown when@whatwg-node/server
is used withnode:http2
and attempts the incoming HTTP/2 request to parse withRequest.json
,Request.text
,Request.formData
, orRequest.blob
methods.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests