Issue in the 0068-feel-equality test?

[jvinis]

The description declares "...expects result: 'true (boolean)'",
but the allowed answer is false! false (boolean)

Tests FEEL expression: 'date and time("2018-10-08T00:00:00+01:00") = date and time("2018-10-08T00:00:00@Europe/Paris")' and expects result: 'true (boolean)' Result of FEEL expression 'date and time("2018-10-08T00:00:00+01:00") = date and time("2018-10-08T00:00:00@Europe/Paris")'? false (boolean) date and time("2018-10-08T00:00:00+01:00") = date and time("2018-10-08T00:00:00@Europe/Paris")

[opatrascoiu]

@jvinis Thank you for raising this. I believe you are referring to the test for datetime_008. The comments in the DMN and TCK files are out of synch with the expected value in the TCK file. We need a PR to change the comments. Would you be able to do that?

[jvinis]

The problem is at the comments (0068-feel-equality.dmn) and at the expected value (0068-feel-equality-test-01.xml).
The test expect false instead of true.

<testCase id="datetime_008"> <description>same datetimes, one with offset and the other with zone are equal</description> <resultNode name="datetime_008" type="decision"> <expected> <value xsi:type="xsd:boolean">false</value> </expected> </resultNode> </testCase>

[opatrascoiu]

@jvinis Yes, you are right, the boolean value specified in the comments (both DMN and TCK file) do not match the expected value (true in comments and false in expected value tag).

However, the test is correct (actual and expected values are the same). The offset of Europe/Paris between the summer transition (end of March) and autumn transition (end of October) is +02:00 not +01:00.

I can think of two options:

change the comments or
change the test to reflect the intention stated in the TCK file by using the +02:00 offset.

[opatrascoiu]

I created a PR here #683 to address the issue.