-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combine per-method specs into per-class organization #57
Comments
No, not really. I'm not sure if it would be simple enough to build one to be honest. btw I still have this organization in most of the projects. Are you thinking about refactoring axiom's spec suite? Because I can totally help. In rom's fork I moved spec/unit to spec-old/unit and I planned to start refactoring (after ast is more or less done) by porting old ones to new ones step-by-step whenever I find time/energy. It would be the best opportunity for me to learn axiom's internals better. |
@dkubb I perform this normally via some shell + vim batch editing. Not too much automated. |
@solnic I was thinking about it. I still really do like the per-method specs, but I realize lots of others don't like it so I'm willing to test per-class specs to see what the change is.
@mbj I was thinking it might be possible to parse the spec files with This might be a make-work project, and it may be possible to do this with shell/perl and a getting my hands dirty. I was just trying to think if there's a simple approach that can produce combined spec files close to what I would write by hand. |
@dkubb for me per-method specs aren't the biggest concern. Here's a list of things I no longer like in no particular order:
So, I'd love to improve that however I'm not exactly sure how you feel about this so I figured I'll just start with a few tests and show it for a review :) |
@solnic @mbj @snusnu do you guys have any tools you've written to do this conversion? I'm willing to try it out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: