Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dogfood #16

Open
nrdxp opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

dogfood #16

nrdxp opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@nrdxp
Copy link
Contributor

nrdxp commented Dec 14, 2022

We need to track breakage as it happens, so we need to dogfood this and test some basic things. Ideally we would want a test for every officially support blocktype in std proper so that we know none of them break for a given changeset.

@nrdxp
Copy link
Contributor Author

nrdxp commented Dec 17, 2022

As PRs are starting to come in, this is gonna be important to make sure we are not constantly breaking things.

@blaggacao
Copy link
Collaborator

blaggacao commented Dec 19, 2022

not constantly breaking things

One aspect to balance though, we should be free of known technical debt, before we stabilize the interface.

The practical question will be if #2, #11 & #12 will require the change of any api in breaking ways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants