-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inconsistent analysis of symbols < and > #45
Comments
also, only for
@danflick see also delph-in/pydelphin#371 |
The lexicon already includes a separate NP entry for the use of ">" as the name of the symbol, but lacked an analogous entry for "<". I have added the missing entry, and will check it in with the next update. |
Sorry GitHub interpreted the greater-than and less-than symbols, I edited my previous comment. @danflick, the crucial problem is the presence of |
@danflick, my problem is the opposite if I understood your comment above. Why preserve the
|
Try parse
The fist sentence has 2 readings. The second one 7 readings. The < is always interpreted as
_less+than_a_1
. The > can be_greater+than_a_1
orquoted
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: