You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A semantic error occurred while decoding the graph. The dominance children h1 and h19 of the root h16 are not hypernormally connected with each other.
Is that a possible situation? The question is if all well-formed MRS should be solvable by Utool or not. Or is it a problem in the Pydelphin well-formed test?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Utool has a slightly different notion of what is well-formed. PyDelphin's check is not terribly strict; the documentation you linked to even states that it checks 3 things:
is the MRS connected (in a graphical sense)
does it have the intrinsic variable property
does it plausibly scope (a handful of fairly simple checks)
The meanings of these things are further explained in the documentation. If you can think of any further well-formedness tests, then I'd consider adding them to PyDelphin.
Consider the sentence from the SICK entailment dataset:
One of the readings produce the MRS:
This MRS passed in the Pydelphin well-formed test:
https://pydelphin.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/delphin.mrs.html#delphin.mrs.is_well_formed
But Utool reports:
Is that a possible situation? The question is if all well-formed MRS should be solvable by Utool or not. Or is it a problem in the Pydelphin well-formed test?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: