Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement Request: Clarification and Consistency of sqlQueryTimeout Behavior #2606

Open
matthieukhl opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
feature request Let's add something new

Comments

@matthieukhl
Copy link

matthieukhl commented May 13, 2024

Currently, there appears to be confusion regarding the behavior of the sqlQueryTimeout configuration parameter in CloudBeaver. The documentation states that it sets the maximum time (in seconds) for SQL query execution, including table data read. However, according to recent discussions and testing, it seems that this setting only affects the SQL editor and does not enforce query execution time limits for other components, such as JDBC drivers interacting with databases like MySQL, TiDB, or ClickHouse.

It is essential to clarify and ensure consistency in the behavior of sqlQueryTimeout across all relevant components within CloudBeaver. This enhancement request proposes the following actions:

  • Documentation Update: Update the documentation to accurately reflect the behavior of sqlQueryTimeout, specifying its scope and limitations. Clearly indicate which components and scenarios are affected by this setting.
  • Feature Enhancement: Extend the functionality of sqlQueryTimeout to enforce query execution time limits consistently across all database interactions, including JDBC drivers.

By addressing these points, CloudBeaver can offer users a more transparent and reliable experience when configuring and managing query execution time limits. This enhancement aligns with the goal of providing robust database management solutions that meet the diverse needs of users.

Thank you for considering this enhancement request.

@matthieukhl matthieukhl added feature request Let's add something new wait for review labels May 13, 2024
@EvgeniaBzzz
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your request! 🦫
We'll discuss it and make improvements in one of the future releases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request Let's add something new
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants