Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request]: Sample use case documentation #402

Open
iplayfast opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[Feature request]: Sample use case documentation #402

iplayfast opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@iplayfast
Copy link

What do you need?

I've seen videos showing how to use fabric as part of a command prompt, but I can't remember where I saw it. What I would like is to have the read me updated to show examples of how to use fabrick.

  1. To get the wisdom from a youtube video
  2. to get the wisdom from a pdf
  3. and all the other things you use fabric for. (I don't know enough in order to ask).
@iplayfast iplayfast added the enhancement New feature or request label May 20, 2024
@fail-open
Copy link

Did you look at the readme? Extracting wisdom from a YouTube video among other examples is provided right there.

@MichaelCade
Copy link

Testing now on 2 but would something like less document.pdf | fabric -p extract_wisdom work, I will give it a go when I can or is there a better way to extract and load a pdf or doc...

@kdubb1337
Copy link

kdubb1337 commented Jun 5, 2024

I very much agree it would be useful to have an example per pattern, even a simple one. The patterns themselves I find very insightful, but sometimes a small example of the type of data that would be expected as the input would make it more obvious how to use them effectively.

Eg for summarize_git_diff something like git diff main | fabric -p summarize_git_diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants