Is it possible to yield RunRequests to a dynamic job name on a sensor, without defining the job name on the sensor decorator?

[biancarosa]

I currently have a sensor that I am trying to get it to work - it is the simplest sensor possible, using just the @sensor() decorator, with no arguments.

This sensor yields run requests based on a few parameters that come from an external source. However, Dagster is currently complaining that I need to define a job_name on the sensor definition.

Is what I'm trying to do - kickoff a job dynamically on a sensor - possible?

[garethbrickman]

I believe you can use the jobs parameter to specify a list of jobs and then in your sensor code you can selectively yield RunRequests for them.

[biancarosa]

So in case I can trigger any job in my repo, I would pass the full list of jobs in the repo to the sensor? Seems a bit of an overkill.