Zenith module repos: (1 repo has many modules) or (1 repo has 1 module)?

[maert]

There are experiments happening around the repos structure for Zenith modules.

A couple of popular patterns are:

https://github.com/shykes/daggerverse
https://github.com/kpenfound/dagger-modules
with many modules under one repo

and

https://github.com/jpadams/dagger-module-trivy
with one module per repo

1 repo has many modules

PRO

CON

1 repo has 1 module

PRO

CON

[shykes]

I am definitely a big proponent of the "daggerverse repo". I like that we're experimenting with different models; and I like that we can accomodate them all; but definitely think the daggerverse repo model is superior, and will gain popularity.

[nipuna-perera]

I agree with Solomon. In fact that's a model we use today with our Jenkins shared libraries. All the functions are in the same repo. I think that's will suit companies who want to maintain a single repo for all their internal dagger modules. Honestly with that, both models are supported as you could technically have a single module per repo if you want.

…

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 17:09 Solomon Hykes ***@***.***> wrote: I am definitely a big proponent of the "daggerverse repo". I like that we're experimenting with different models; and I like that we can accomodate them all; but definitely think the daggerverse repo model is superior, and will gain popularity. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5818 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACYJ6FRNRPE5RJUNRZ7HDM3X3YEAXANCNFSM6AAAAAA5DSSCBI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>