Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

opt-usrlocal treefile option is too specific #4893

Open
jmpolom opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

opt-usrlocal treefile option is too specific #4893

jmpolom opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jmpolom
Copy link

jmpolom commented Mar 27, 2024

Both /opt and /usr/local should be separately configurable as symlinks into respective directories in /var. A user may want one but not both to be persisted via /var or may wish to mount other filesystems into a normal directory for one of them.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Yes, I completely agree. The direction I want to take things is to move towards supporting arbitrary front ends (dnf —installroot etc) and just doing a commit here. There, one can set up the filesystem however you like without us trying to have a declarative front end to all permutations of things.

@jmpolom
Copy link
Author

jmpolom commented Apr 18, 2024

Yes, I completely agree. The direction I want to take things is to move towards supporting arbitrary front ends (dnf —installroot etc) and just doing a commit here. There, one can set up the filesystem however you like without us trying to have a declarative front end to all permutations of things.

Would something like this not ultimately be more of an ostree activity/feature, outside of rpm-ostree? rpm-ostree seems fairly tied to the rpm/dnf ecosystem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants