You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A few months ago, NIST finalized a standard for hash-based digital signatures based on SPHINCS+ (submitted to the NIST Post-Quantum Standardization effort): https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final
It would be really cool to add support for this algorithm and even experiment with using STARKs to implement multi-signatures over it (as a Post-Quantum Multi-Signature option). There are some other options that uses lattices (like Dilithium) but I expect those would be a lot slower to run in a STARK (and are a much newer concept).
This will probably require a lot of research to get right but figure its worth posting here for someone to dig into.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A few months ago, NIST finalized a standard for hash-based digital signatures based on SPHINCS+ (submitted to the NIST Post-Quantum Standardization effort): https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final
It would be really cool to add support for this algorithm and even experiment with using STARKs to implement multi-signatures over it (as a Post-Quantum Multi-Signature option). There are some other options that uses lattices (like Dilithium) but I expect those would be a lot slower to run in a STARK (and are a much newer concept).
This will probably require a lot of research to get right but figure its worth posting here for someone to dig into.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: