Skip to content

Code generation of environment values #1103

Answered by stylewarning
jbouwman asked this question in Help!
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I think the answer is "yes" since (re-)loading FASLs should be enough to allow later/further Coalton code to be type checked.

A problem we were having before was that FASLs would get cached (without the env updates) by ASDF and when new Coalton code was loaded, old cached FASLs would be loaded, but the Coalton compiler wouldn't know anything, and lead to errors.

We should be more rigorous with load form definitions.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by jbouwman
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Help!
Labels
None yet
2 participants