Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NDN Packet Format Spec V 0.3 #229

Open
cgundogan opened this issue Apr 5, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

NDN Packet Format Spec V 0.3 #229

cgundogan opened this issue Apr 5, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cgundogan
Copy link
Collaborator

NDN provides documentation for an updated packet format, the spec can be found here [1].
The new packet format looks promising. We should support that in the near future.

[1] https://named-data.net/doc/NDN-packet-spec/current/

@mfrey mfrey self-assigned this Apr 5, 2018
@mfrey
Copy link
Collaborator

mfrey commented Apr 5, 2018

I'm wondering if we should preserve ndn2013 or integrate 0.3 and update the parts in code where necessary (so ndn2013 evolves to something like ndn2018)? Any thoughts @blacksheeep

@blacksheeep
Copy link
Contributor

blacksheeep commented Apr 5, 2018

I would update the packet format, I would argue there is no advantage of maintaining a stale version of a packet format.

@mfrey
Copy link
Collaborator

mfrey commented Apr 5, 2018

Apparently, there is basically no implementation which supports it (yet). I can't estimate yet how much it differs from 0.2 and 0.3 is still subject to change. On the other hand I also only have vague understanding of the number of features of 0.2.1 ccn-lite supports.

@mfrey
Copy link
Collaborator

mfrey commented Apr 10, 2018

We probably should also be aware that this is very likely to break the python scripts in src/py.

@mfrey mfrey removed their assignment Apr 23, 2018
@yoursunny
Copy link

there is basically no implementation which supports it

There is implementation of NDN v0.3 now.
I have a C language decoder in https://github.com/usnistgov/ndn-dpdk csrc/ndni folder.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants