-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove javadoc fallback #160
Comments
Isn't this unrelated to to what |
But 11 (or any single choice) isn't accurate, also can lack results for the newer classes that can get added for each JDK. When enrich-classpath gets its finishing touch I'd feel more comfortable tweaking this section of code. |
Yeah, that's fair. Frankly, I'm not sure in which case |
This was addressed in bb22fb3, right? |
SGTM. We don't give a lot of uses to javadoc anyway |
orchard/src/orchard/java.clj
Line 385 in c0e24f7
11
isn't a special JDK and defaulting to it can mask issues (especially as we complete and enable enrich-classpath)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: