-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement DeepHoldIn node #75
Comments
The idea being the Hold in would be the samples which aren't in the HoldOut, basically? Yeah, I've definitely wanted that before. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Another idea is some more merge nodes.
As a start a DeepHoldIn would be handy. Basically very similar to the DeepMerge set to Holdout. but rather than a "stencil" it would be a "mask" in Merge terms.
If we get a proper set up for combining multiple deeps with each other, i might have some more ideas.
so far i am not aware of a good approach of even mimic a deep merge or holdout.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: