-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 239
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why is nominal trajectory not used in iLQR control law? #113
Comments
@sklaw hello, I am confused by the linear-gaussian policy u = K * x + k, if we use iLQR, why not the cotrol u = \bar{u} + k + K * (x - \bar{x}) |
Hi. I'm also confused by this part, too. It seems the author of this code assumed the nominal trajectory is 0... But if so the whole trajectory optimization would be really weird |
It seems the following line computes new action without any use of nominal trajectory:
gps/python/gps/algorithm/traj_opt/traj_opt_lqr_python.py
Line 257 in 82fa6cc
But in the following papers, nominal trajectory seems to be essential in the whole iLQR algorithm:
equation (8b) in this paper
equation (3) in this paper
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: