You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since CFF was adopted as the default for lesson citation (carpentries/sandpaper#583), we will need to provide Maintainers and lesson developers with advice on what information to include in their lessons' CITATION.cff files, and how to keep that information up-to-date. Ideas for what to include:
lessons should use type: dataset in their CFF, not type: software
do we make a recommendation of author list order, and criteria for inclusion in that list?
when, and how often, should maintainers update the CFF?
I propose to draft and include this after the handbook launch. We are still waiting for the next version of the CFF specification to be released before we can roll CITATION.cff files out across our official lessons. I want to handle that process centrally, to ensure consistency across our many lesson repositories. My concern is that including this in the handbook now might give Maintainers the impression that we want them to take care of it themselves.
Since CFF was adopted as the default for lesson citation (carpentries/sandpaper#583), we will need to provide Maintainers and lesson developers with advice on what information to include in their lessons'
CITATION.cff
files, and how to keep that information up-to-date. Ideas for what to include:type: dataset
in their CFF, nottype: software
.cff
for the reference section citation-file-format/citation-file-format#538 (comment))The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: