You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we show candidates who have filed an intention to run form (501). Not all of those candidates will qualify to make it on the ballot. Should we continue to show them all the way until the day of the election? There is a cutoff in August to qualify for the ballot. Probably we should use that cutoff as the date on which to stop showing candidates that have no qualified for the ballot.
Also, should we show an indication of whether a candidate has qualified for ballot yet?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this was more prevalent earlier in the year when candidates were less-defined, but I believe we have now refined the spreadsheet/our data to only be showing candidates who have officially qualified for the ballot, now that the deadline has passed. Is that right @sfdoran ?
My preference is to take candidates who do not have a committee and effectively drop out of the election by not making the ballot off the site - they have no data AND they are not on the ballot.
People who don't make the ballot but have a campaign committee with data should stay because it shows the full picture of campaign funding and spending.
Currently we show candidates who have filed an intention to run form (501). Not all of those candidates will qualify to make it on the ballot. Should we continue to show them all the way until the day of the election? There is a cutoff in August to qualify for the ballot. Probably we should use that cutoff as the date on which to stop showing candidates that have no qualified for the ballot.
Also, should we show an indication of whether a candidate has qualified for ballot yet?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: