Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we remove the timing page? #75

Closed
GentlemanHal opened this issue May 11, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Can we remove the timing page? #75

GentlemanHal opened this issue May 11, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels
won't fix Changes that the team will not make as they conflict with the projects goals

Comments

@GentlemanHal
Copy link
Member

Is configuring the polling time really required?

I'll admit the main reason I don't like it is because it's an entire section for a single field, but it got me thinking does it matter to a user?

If you want a better reason, it allows the users to put 5x the load on the server by setting it to 1 second, and they have no incentive not to do so.

@joejag
Copy link
Contributor

joejag commented May 11, 2015

I was thinking the 'sleep' section would go on there
On 11 May 2015 7:58 pm, "Christopher Martin" [email protected]
wrote:

Is configuring the polling time really required?

I'll admit the main reason I don't like it is because it's an entire
section for a single field, but it got me thinking does it matter to a user?

If you want a better reason, it allows the users to put 5x the load on the
server by setting it to 1 second, and they have no incentive not to do so.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#75.

@GentlemanHal
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm, interesting.

Sleeping applies to specific projects so if we wanted to add it to the timing section we'd need to come up with a nice way that doesn't involve duplicating the tracking page.

@joejag
Copy link
Contributor

joejag commented May 11, 2015

About sleep we have is for the whole monitor to prevent screen burn
On 11 May 2015 8:30 pm, "Christopher Martin" [email protected]
wrote:

Hmm, interesting.

Sleeping applies to specific projects so if we wanted to add it to the
timing section we'd need to come up with a nice way that doesn't involve
duplicating the tracking page.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#75 (comment)
.

@GentlemanHal
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, issue #71? I thought you meant issue #42

@GentlemanHal
Copy link
Member Author

We could potentially use it for issue #42 as well by adding an auto complete dropdown box for choosing a build to snooze.

@joejag
Copy link
Contributor

joejag commented May 11, 2015

Yup, I meant both sleeps
On 11 May 2015 8:34 pm, "Christopher Martin" [email protected]
wrote:

We could potentially use it for issue #42
#42 as well by
adding an auto complete dropdown box for choosing a build to snooze.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#75 (comment)
.

@GentlemanHal
Copy link
Member Author

You've convinced me, closing. Quickest issue ever!

@GentlemanHal GentlemanHal added the won't fix Changes that the team will not make as they conflict with the projects goals label Jul 15, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
won't fix Changes that the team will not make as they conflict with the projects goals
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants