You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran your code on my own Hi-C data for 3 cell lines (Neural progenitors cell lines, Derived Neurons and Astrocyte glials) using the methodology you describe, but I find a average number of associated distal enhancers per genes lower than 2 (about 1.80 for my 3 cell lines).
You mentioned in one of the last section of your github, some adjustments can be done, quantile normalization or modify the ABC-Score threshold.
I used default settings of you code, KR normalization on 10 Kb resolution, however when I VC normalize my data I obtain a average number of distal enhancer in the required range of values.
I would like to know what is the preferred setting to adjust? Do quantile normalization, decrease the threshold, use a particular normalization ?
Thanks,
Loic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lmangnier
changed the title
what's the preferred setting when mean associated enhancer is lower than 2 ?
what's the preferred setting when mean associated enhancers is lower than 2 ?
Aug 22, 2020
Hi there,
I ran your code on my own Hi-C data for 3 cell lines (Neural progenitors cell lines, Derived Neurons and Astrocyte glials) using the methodology you describe, but I find a average number of associated distal enhancers per genes lower than 2 (about 1.80 for my 3 cell lines).
You mentioned in one of the last section of your github, some adjustments can be done, quantile normalization or modify the ABC-Score threshold.
I used default settings of you code, KR normalization on 10 Kb resolution, however when I VC normalize my data I obtain a average number of distal enhancer in the required range of values.
I would like to know what is the preferred setting to adjust? Do quantile normalization, decrease the threshold, use a particular normalization ?
Thanks,
Loic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: