You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing this helpful package; I’ve really enjoyed using it for exploratory data analysis.
Recently, I encountered an issue when generating a heatmap with DataExplorer. For a dataset with no missing data points, it worked perfectly. However, after deleting some outliers, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) no longer seemed accurate. I calculated the PCC using other packages and Excel, and their results were consistent, but different from those generated by DataExplorer.
Could you kindly look into this issue? Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @LKguan, thanks for raising the issue. If you take a look at the source code, it does nothing else but calling cor with supplies arguments (if any). Could you try passing your data directly to cor to validate again?
Hi Boxuan,
Thank you for developing this helpful package; I’ve really enjoyed using it for exploratory data analysis.
Recently, I encountered an issue when generating a heatmap with DataExplorer. For a dataset with no missing data points, it worked perfectly. However, after deleting some outliers, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) no longer seemed accurate. I calculated the PCC using other packages and Excel, and their results were consistent, but different from those generated by DataExplorer.
Could you kindly look into this issue? Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: