diff --git a/EFCore.BulkExtensions.Tests/IncludeGraph/Issue1337.cs b/EFCore.BulkExtensions.Tests/IncludeGraph/Issue1337.cs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..daaad4c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/EFCore.BulkExtensions.Tests/IncludeGraph/Issue1337.cs
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+using System.Collections.Generic;
+using System.Threading.Tasks;
+using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
+using Xunit;
+
+namespace EFCore.BulkExtensions.Tests.IncludeGraph;
+
+public class Issue1337
+{
+    [Fact]
+    public async Task Issue1337Test()
+    {
+        using var context = new MyDbContext(ContextUtil.GetOptions<MyDbContext>(databaseName: $"{nameof(EFCoreBulkTest)}_Issue1337"));
+
+        context.Database.EnsureDeleted();
+        context.Database.EnsureCreated();
+
+        var bulkConfig = new BulkConfig { IncludeGraph = true, CalculateStats = true };
+
+        Cust[] entities = [
+            new()
+            {
+                CustId = "test1",
+                ContactMethods = new()
+                {
+                    HomePhone = "homephone1",
+                    EmailAdresses = [
+                        new Email() { Address = "email1", Type = "emailtype1" },
+                        new Email() { Address = "email2", Type = "emailtype2" },
+                    ]
+                },
+            }
+        ];
+
+        // Without any changes, this crashes with System.InvalidOperationException : Column 'ContactMethodsCustomerId' does not allow DBNull.Value.
+
+        // With the changes in this PR until now, the merge of the emails works, but now I get an error when trying to read the output of that operation:
+        // System.InvalidOperationException : An exception was thrown while attempting to evaluate a LINQ query parameter expression. See the inner exception for more information.
+        // ----System.InvalidOperationException : Cannot create a DbSet for 'Email' because it is configured as an owned entity type and must be accessed through its owning entity type 'ContactMethods'.See https://aka.ms/efcore-docs-owned for more information.
+
+        await context.BulkInsertOrUpdateAsync(entities, bulkConfig);
+    }
+}
+
+public class Cust
+{
+    public string CustId { get; set; } = default!;
+    public ContactMethods ContactMethods { get; set; } = default!;
+}
+
+public class ContactMethods
+{
+    public string HomePhone { get; set; } = default!;
+    public ICollection<Email> EmailAdresses { get; set; } = default!;
+}
+
+public class Email
+{
+    public string Address { get; set; } = default!;
+    public string Type { get; set; } = default!;
+}
+
+public class MyDbContext(DbContextOptions opts) : DbContext(opts)
+{
+    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
+    {
+        modelBuilder.Entity<Cust>(c =>
+            c.OwnsOne(c => c.ContactMethods, cm => cm.OwnsMany(y => y.EmailAdresses)));
+    }
+}
diff --git a/EFCore.BulkExtensions/DbContextBulkTransactionGraphUtil.cs b/EFCore.BulkExtensions/DbContextBulkTransactionGraphUtil.cs
index 7bace99f..73c48f9a 100644
--- a/EFCore.BulkExtensions/DbContextBulkTransactionGraphUtil.cs
+++ b/EFCore.BulkExtensions/DbContextBulkTransactionGraphUtil.cs
@@ -100,6 +100,28 @@ private static async Task ExecuteWithGraphAsync(DbContext context, IEnumerable<o
 
                     UpdateStats(stats, bulkConfig);
                 }
+
+                // We also have to set the foreign keys of potential dependents of owned types that are in the same table as this one
+                foreach (var ng in graphNodesGroupedByType.Where(ng => 
+                    context.Model.FindEntityType(ng.Key) is { } entityType 
+                    && OwnedTypeUtil.IsOwnedInSameTableAsOwner(entityType)))
+                {
+                    foreach(var dependentOfSameType in SetForeignKeysForDependentsAndYieldSameTypeDependents(context, ng.Key, ng))
+                    {
+                        var dependentTableInfo = TableInfo.CreateInstance(context, entityClrType, dependentsOfSameType, operationType, bulkConfig);
+
+                        if (isAsync)
+                        {
+                            await SqlBulkOperation.MergeAsync(context, entityClrType, dependentsOfSameType, dependentTableInfo, operationType, progress, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
+                        }
+                        else
+                        {
+                            SqlBulkOperation.Merge(context, entityClrType, dependentsOfSameType, dependentTableInfo, operationType, progress);
+                        }
+
+                        UpdateStats(stats, bulkConfig);
+                    }
+                }
             }
 
             if (bulkConfig.CalculateStats)
diff --git a/EFCore.BulkExtensions/Util/GraphUtil.cs b/EFCore.BulkExtensions/Util/GraphUtil.cs
index 7cf31e12..f7e879be 100644
--- a/EFCore.BulkExtensions/Util/GraphUtil.cs
+++ b/EFCore.BulkExtensions/Util/GraphUtil.cs
@@ -110,7 +110,11 @@ private static void SetDependencies(DbContext dbContext, GraphDependency graphDe
             graphDependency.DependsOn.Add((navigationValue, navigation));
             nestedDependency.Dependents.Add((graphEntity, navigation.Inverse ?? navigation));
         }
-        else
+
+        // Not sure this is the right thing to do here, but this way the "owned types in same table as owner"
+        // also get added to dependents, which is necessary to be able to set foreign keys of potential dependents of this owned type
+        // (See the change in DbContextBulkTransactionGraphUtil ExecuteWithGraphAsync)
+        if (!navigation.IsOnDependent)
         {
             graphDependency.Dependents.Add((navigationValue, navigation));
             nestedDependency.DependsOn.Add((graphEntity, navigation.Inverse ?? navigation));