-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New "Your Books" view? #3500
Comments
Just ideas:
|
Thanks @Skivling !! Something liiiiiike With the same behavior if you click a book — opening up the "write a review" pane right under that book: idk maybe that is silly UX too? imo I NEVER use that pane (I add a rating to the book when I mark it as done / "read" but that's a star rating on the page of the book (which, yeah, takes an extra step #2693) so I don't have to give it text too. so maybe other users who use that pane more often would be annoyed by this. not sure how burdensome it is relative to clicking in the horizontal scroll pane right now though :) |
+1 for that, it looks nice to me. |
@j6k4m8 The 'idk something else' section would be a suggestion from your to-read list. I also think it should adapt to how many are being read currently. In the example there are 3 books currently being read so the other two sections should also show 3 books so it's even? Also note that on mobile it might be really weird with 3 vertical columns of one's books. |
Right now, the "Your Books" section of the homepage is a bit hard to use/parse. It only shows a small number of books, but there's a mysterious rightward scroll... If you have more than five "currently reading" books then it shows no others. If you have fewer, then there are completely hidden sections to the right, behind a scroll. Others have commented on this unintuitive UI, such as #3468 and some commentary in #2481.
Describe the solution you'd like
Wondering if the Bookwyrm team would be interested in a PR implementing something more like this;
Would of course be willing to put my python where my mouth is, so to speak :) And also I'm interested in others' opinions on the UI here, this is clearly not the perfect answer yet...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: