Skip to content

建议:笔记能否增加一个文件夹功能 || Suggestions: Can you add a folder function to note #574

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
DomenCai opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DomenCai
Copy link

DomenCai commented Mar 24, 2025

今天想用 Blinko 实现 PARA,参考 这篇文章

其中 闪念,归档,都可以用 Blinko 已有的模块替代,但是 Project,Area,Resources 这几个模块比较不方便,如果可以在笔记里面有文件夹的概念,就可以完美使用了

ps:虽然可以用标签的来替代文件夹的功能,但是如果可以像 Apple Note 一样用文件夹会更加直观,加上快速拖拽会更加方便


Today I want to implement PARA with Blinko, refer to this article

Among them, flash ideas and archives can be replaced by existing modules of Blinko, but the modules of Project, Area, and Resources are relatively inconvenient. If you can have the concept of folders in your notes, you can use them perfectly.

ps: Although you can use labels to replace the function of folders, it will be more intuitive if you can use folders like Apple Note, and it will be more convenient to drag and drop quickly

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title 建议:笔记能否增加一个文件夹功能 建议:笔记能否增加一个文件夹功能 || Suggestions: Can you add a folder function to note Mar 24, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 24, 2025
@xmskf
Copy link

xmskf commented Mar 27, 2025

支持 +1


Support +1

@ssly
Copy link
Contributor

ssly commented Apr 4, 2025

那你们的标签用来做什么用呢?
我看这个工具标签是可以分级的。


So what are your labels used for?
I see that this tool tag can be graded.

@jcrabapple
Copy link

I would also love to have folders and/or collections in addition to tagging.

@dev-Blaze
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants