-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello and some questions :) #77
Comments
Hi, @johan12345 , thank you for your questions / your proposal! I would be very interested in working together, and also very interested in extending OCPDB. I know your project a bit, as I looked at it some time back, and I really like what you do. I always wondered if we can get together the open approaches of charge data, especially with AFIR and other regulations at the horizon. Maybe, it makes sense to do a call about that?
Sounds very much in line with what we try to do with OCPDB: pure backend project providing as much open data as possible.
Yea, that's a pain in the whole industry. The Ladenetz OCHP data are from https://stadtnavi.de , an open mobility routing project. I was always interested in GoingElectric credentials, btw, but back then, it was not re-publishable. It seems that this changed?
Absolutely!
I really would like to, but ... well. That's really difficult, as Hubjects business model is a lot about data access. I have some hopes because of AFIR, and the enforcement of publishing data starting at April this year, but, well, regulation and reality always had some more gaps in the past.
Yes, although this is quite some work if we want to do that in a good way. The variety of prices and contract conditions are quite a pain, for end users and for developers.
Of course I prefer open data. I would be fine to develop importers for non-open-data, but I do see a legal risk to host that. Maybe, it makes more sense to ask for AFIR data?
Absolutely, when we connect databases, matching is essential, and especially crowdsourced databases have often the same issue as BNetzA data has: no EVSE = no global unique identifier to make a simple matching. |
Hi, thank you for the response! Yes, the GoingElectric API terms and conditions are unfortunately quite restrictive, see here - the data is not re-publishable. I guess in general it might be okay to access their data from a server - but that server should then not provide access to the GoingElectric data through a public API (which would fine for EVMap if I were to run my own instance and protect its API - but not for a public OCPDB instance). Maybe matching could still be done on the server, but then just provide the ID of the matching GoingElectric entry without redistributing the rest of the data? The downside then is that chargers that only appear on GoingElectric couldn't be included. And as you said, the matching is not quite straightforward as GoingElectric doesn't have the EVSEID (at least not available through the API). I know that there are some pretty good open data efforts in other European countries, including realtime data for at least a a significant portion of the operators:
Austria also has open data, but without realtime status so far. In terms of public but undocumented APIs, I know of:
Oh yeah, good point. Maybe it makes sense to contact Hubject and/or some of the CPOs on how they are planning to address these requirements from the AFIR...
Yes, unfortunately 🙁. The data structure would need to accomodate all the possible pricing models and roaming agreements, and it's also not easy to gather this data (would probably need to be crowdsourced and/or scraped from the CPOs' and EMPs' apps/websites). |
Hi! I maintain EVMap, an open source Android app to find charging stations, and just stumbled upon your OCPDB project, which looks really interesting. Maybe it makes sense to collaborate?
Currently EVMap mainly relies on community-maintained data sources such as GoingElectric and Open Charge Map (and in the future, OSM and Nobil) for static charging station information, and matches them with a few additional data sources for realtime status and pricing. At the moment everything is done on the client side, connecting directly to the data sources - there is no backend component yet to aggregate the different sources. Also, being manually maintained by the community, GE and OCM increasingly run into the problem that the data is incomplete or out of date. So something like OCPDB as a backend might be a better solution in the mid-term future, if it would provide similar coverage to the current sources.
A few questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: