Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance on non overlap object #32

Open
Toledo1 opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Performance on non overlap object #32

Toledo1 opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Toledo1
Copy link

Toledo1 commented Apr 26, 2020

Hi @bharatsingh430 , I wish to know if you have tested the performance of Softnms on dataset with non-overlap objects(considering that objects are not overlaped), can it still be better than classic NMS?
@bharatsingh430
Copy link
Owner

NMS should work fine if there is no overlap. Although Soft-NMS would also give the same results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bharatsingh430 @Toledo1