Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[META] Ideas 馃挕 #2402

Open
7 of 26 tasks
moul opened this issue Oct 1, 2020 · 11 comments
Open
7 of 26 tasks

[META] Ideas 馃挕 #2402

moul opened this issue Oct 1, 2020 · 11 comments

Comments

@moul
Copy link
Member

moul commented Oct 1, 2020

This meta issue contains various ideas that may never be implemented, it's a good place to put things that could create useless noise in the issues section

Misc

  • add a way to configure the CLI and apps to have two loggers, a full one in JSON in a file + a filtered one formatted for console on stdout
  • add i18n support on CLI help messages
  • add i18n support on error messages
  • add i18n for berty services
  • support dns-backed invite links berty://dns/testbot.berty.io
  • embed changelog in the app (mobile & CLI)

Tyber

  • tyber.berty.io service for when a staff team member is testing Messenger on their phone
  • colorize/iconize the main verbs (Sending,Received,Interract,Initializing)
  • odd/even colorization alternate on method names (uncamelize)

Doc

  • add various demonstration gifs in README.md files (Add demo.gif in the README.md聽#2080)
  • add graphs (flow, DAG) to explain some particular parts
  • start sharing our architecture decision resources in docs/
  • add a big-picture of the architecture with high-level components interaction

Quality/CI

  • remove Lerna monorepo in JS
  • switch moment.js usage to day.js and remove moment.js (Remove moment.js聽#2174)
  • send integration's benchmark results on datadog
  • add a way of skipping CI tests right away from a commit/PR (DONE. GitHub actions now support this.)
  • Test sending very very long messages
  • Test against DBs with various states (account testdatas)
  • Switch to buf.build
  • Switch to protopatch
  • Optimize self-hosted CIs with local cache (https://github.com/MasterworksIO/action-local-cache)

Bots

  • testbot, a bot dedicated to unittest and integration tests that allow testing the app in real conditions (without mocks)
  • devbot, a bot dedicated to berty developers (staff and external), similar to betabot, without the onboarding scenario and with more advanced debugging helpers
  • bertybot go library, a library improving berty bots' development in go

Misc

  • Proximity relay device (raspi with BLE and relay node) (A possible Weshnet project)
@moul moul changed the title [META] Improvement ideas 馃挕 [META] Ideas 馃挕 Oct 1, 2020
@moul moul added this to Ideas 馃挕 in META Oct 1, 2020
This was referenced Oct 1, 2020
@moul moul pinned this issue Oct 1, 2020
@nett-ef
Copy link

nett-ef commented Jan 13, 2022

I vote for the following ideas:

  • clear chat history
  • remove individual messages
  • self-destructing message timer
  • password lock

All of the above features work as in Signal by cleaning up local history from user's device.
I've read the FAQ about BOR messages (https://berty.tech/faq#will-it-have-features-such-as-self-destructing-messages-and-bor) but there is an example when it's needed: a friend of mine is visiting BY or KZ where people are protesting on streets. I'm sure that he uses the official client so there's no fear of modified client. But there is a fear of friend being caught by the bad guys. Some remediation measures are needed: self-destructing message timer allows us to set 'retention policy' on chat messages reducing the amount of messages being read in the worst-case scenario when a bad guy seizes the phone. Ability to remove the chat or individual messages from the chat allows the friend to clean up history when he gets suspicious that the bad guys can arrest him. The password lock further increases the security by preventing the bad guys from accessing the messenger until the friend tells them the password. He may wait for retention period to expire before telling the password and also, most of the bad guys are not technical experts so they need time to find an expert.

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Mar 1, 2024

Will ask @gfanton if we have really implemented "support encrypted invite links (berty ID) berty://enc/..."

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Mar 1, 2024

At one point, "betabot, a bot dedicated to onboard people discovering the app" was implemented, but we removed it because Apple App Store doesn't like "beta" in the product code.

@costinberty
Copy link
Contributor

costinberty commented Mar 1, 2024

@jefft0 this is the Miro board with the HL Berty Messenger components' interaction. https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVPNg94dw=/?share_link_id=223566906154

miro.com

@costinberty to put the diagram in the GitHub Berty README.

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Mar 1, 2024

Ask @moul how we're using (and paying for) Datadog (or other such services).

@costinberty
Copy link
Contributor

support encrypted invite links (berty ID) berty://enc/... is at least partially implemented on back-end but not front-end. Here are some tests writte for this: https://github.com/berty/berty/blob/master/go/pkg/bertylinks/links_test.go#L243

We need to investigate a bit to see what is missing.

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Mar 15, 2024

Removed item "find a way to sync or at least backup our Datadog configuration somewhere in a git repo". We're not using the Datadog service now.

@costinberty
Copy link
Contributor

Opened #4820 to add the Berty Messenger High Level Architecture to the repo

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Mar 21, 2024

Opened #4820 to add the Berty Messenger High Level Architecture to the repo

The PR is merged. Marked "add a big-picture of the architecture with high-level components interaction" as done.

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Mar 22, 2024

support encrypted invite links (berty ID) berty://enc/... is at least partially implemented on back-end but not front-end. Here are some tests writte for this: https://github.com/berty/berty/blob/master/go/pkg/bertylinks/links_test.go#L243

We need to investigate a bit to see what is missing.

@moul says that the back end code for encrypted links is already implemented. We just need a UI to prompt for passwords. This item is moved to a separate issue #4822 .

@jefft0
Copy link
Collaborator

jefft0 commented Apr 5, 2024

All the items in the description have been reviewed. We addressed some of them, and we split off issues like #4822. Put this in backlog and revisit occasionally when we have resources.

@jefft0 jefft0 added the backlog label Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
META
Ideas 馃挕
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants