-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only about 77% of bounding boxes labels can be inferred #17
Comments
I am currently involved in another project. I will try to add this feature in my spare time. |
Thank you very much for considering it, that would be very helpful ! =) |
Hello @Xia0ben, |
@supriya-gdptl I just uploaded the code I wrote to infer the semantic labels from the images for the bounding boxes on a fork of this repository: https://github.com/Xia0ben/Structured3D. I do not have the time to cleanup/document the code right now, so it would be nice to do a pull-request directly to @bertjiazheng 's main repo if you were to use it and clean it up a bit. I mainly reused existing code written by @bertjiazheng , there is not much more to it but it would indeed be helpful if a proper script were added to the main repo. ;-) Cheers, |
Hello,
I followed your advice in Issue #13 to infer the semantic labels associated with the bounding boxes, but have only succeeded in inferring 77% of them from the instance.png and semantic.png images of each scene (for 438311 bounding boxes, only 337345 could be inferred, that is more exactly 76.9647579002%).
This missing quarter of information is quite big, and seems as I feared in my message in Issue #13, to be due to object occlusion in the images. Therefore, it seems that it is impossible for end users to infer the missing data. Would you please consider filling in the gap =) ?
Wish you a nice day !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: